ปรีชาpricha: ฉันคิด ฉันจึงบล็อก...: BBC and the First Hakka Female PIME Minister of the World

ละครโศกนาฎกรรมเช็คสเปียร์ ต้องได้อาย เมื่อเผชิญกับ งิ้วสุขนาฎกรรมแคะ

Shakespearian Tragedy Theatre gone bankrupt facing

Hakka Opera Comedy

This article criticizes Mr. Jonathan Head’s interview with Mademoiselle First HakKa Female Prime Minister of the World (Mademoiselle FHK-FPM of the world), except for a brief comment in the next paragraph which I analyse la grande Mademoiselle doing sitting comedy.

The BBC clip, the original BBC video link at youtube http://youtu.be/hkmLxT4Alfo ,

begins with Mademoiselle FHK-FPM of the World’s exposition,

“Uhh euhh I’ll say that some group of the people might not accept us. But please arch(ask) for the many of the group of the people because the majority some also support us, because I think we also doing all the policy and run the country. But, anyway, I am kaim form the election. I think this is the one thing that the way to tell that this government satisfy with the people is democracy. I think this is the way that the thing should be. So that’s why myself and my government, we are kaim form…form the election. So I think the election and democracy has the process to monitor and to be judged and to evaluate myself that whether I should be in this position or not.”

My comment:

Awesome! Mademoiselle FHK-FPM of the World’s ingenious Hakka Tinglish enchants me. So too charming vely much indeed, I love it too much, baby. That she should not be in the position of Hakka Prime Minister in Thailand (not of Thailand), is out of question. Brilliant feats of rote talking, I could not arch(ask) for more. Please watch her beginning exposition three times before going on with the rest of my critique.

Her opening monologue diminishes me, a veteran learner of English. It awakens me to linguistic enlightenment nightmare: finding new phrases and useful explessions, for example, I kaim form…..and others. The perverse eloquence of her creative English magically introduces something surprising, sublime, and way out-of-the-box. Je ne pourrais pas trouver de mieux.

At video time 00:00:30, Mr. Jonathan Head cocks his head to right, after blinking his eyes in awe and disbelief. At this point in time I wonder with which Shakespearian comedian does he learn how to seem so sincere? Or, is his face simply mirroring that of the interviewee?

QUESTION number 1

Mr.Jonathan Head—Q. In that case why don’t you call a new election now?

Mademoiselle FHK-FPM of the World--A. [ขออภัย ท่านผู้อ่านสองสามท่าน -- ที่อังกิดมิถนัด เพราะผู้วิจารณ์ไม่บังอาจถ่ายทอดคำตอบของ “ท่านยิ่งลักษณ์ ชินวัตร” เป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรได้ I dare not do the tlanscliption, for fear of “the lool of law.”]

Analysis and critique of question number 1

At video time 00:00:59, right after the question, we must look at Mr. Jonathan Head’s hands, and observe how he clasps them. While his fingers interlace, they move intermittently,

1) firstly, his left thumb and left index finger behave like a pair of chopsticks, gripping on his right index finger,

2) then, his right thumb nudge the knuckle of his left thumb, and fingers of both hands stay in pause position for a moment,

3) suddenly, when Mademoiselle FHK-FPM of the World said, “…iiiiiif the situation stops…” Mr. Jonathan Head’s right index finger cocks straight up, pointing aggressively toward la grande Mademoiselle.

These are mysterious signs that I prefer not to interpret, but observe.

QUESTION number 2

Mr.Jonathan Head--Q. So you don’t want to call an election now, but maybe later?

Analysis and critique of question number 2

Now Mr. Jonathan Head opts for answering his own question, charmingly adding a tag of “maybe”. Remember, “maybe” is a sexy English expression: sort of, not now…..maybe later Josephine.

QUESTION number 3

Mr.Jonathan Head--Q. They might not be (satisfied with your calling an election now), but if you call an election it would take some of the pressure out. People would focus on campaigning. Wouldn’t that be a good solution right now?

Analysis and critique of question number 3

People would focus on campaigning, says Mr. Jonathan Head. Campaigning, but what campaign? The campaign for a snap election? Tu parles!

In Thailand, next time in Ukraine and soon elsewhere, an election is more like farting; it cannot always be snapped up like finger flicking.

Mr. Jonathan Head shows a simplistic snapshot view of Thailand’s politics. His M.A. in South East Asian Area Studies form a Blitish University is subject to immediate recall.

QUESTION number 4

Mr.Jonathan Head--Q. If this protest carries on this way will you at some stage have to use force against them, deploy the police, use much tougher method, do you think?

Analysis and critique of question number 4

The question is a hawkish suggestion with a specific dose of brutal prescription to suppress non-violent protesters. How shocking! Sir, Thailand is not Blitish India. Sortez de l’histoire, s’il vous plaît.

QUESTION number 5

Mr.Jonathan Head--Q. They(the police)…..they’re just back off completely, aren’t they? The police is doing nothing at the moment.

Analysis and critique of question number 5

With question number five, Mr.Jonathan Head insinuates that his question number four is truly a suggestion to use force, in awkward disguise. He shouldn’t have…..

Bravo! A BBC correspondent that operates regional office in Bangkok suggests to the Hakka Prime Minister in Thailand to use force to crush peaceful Thai protesters!

What the f_ck! Madre de Dios. Du con-à-merde. Mais, putain, je manque de mots, moi.

QUESTION number 6

Mr.Jonathan Head--Q. Given how much pressure that weights on you, why don’t you just give up the job and go back and do your business job? You get much less pressure, much less abuse.

Analysis and critique of question number 6

This is a question of the genre “Sense and Sensibility”. Since Mademoiselle FHK.FPM of the World is only doing her regular Hakka Opera Comedy’s comic scene, therefore, from where could have the “much pressure” come? Sir, it’s non-Sense and no-Sensibility.

Getting much less “abuse”? Is Mr. Jonathan Head accusing many of la grande Mademoiselle’s faceless opponents and haters that they are doing harm to a little girl under the age of consent? Quelle horreur! Pervers! Pédophile!

La grande Mademoiselle, as almost everybody in Thailand understands, has an unofficial husband or lover or consort or whatever the more polite term may apply. She is a mademoiselle, not a married woman, according to the rule of law: section 1457, Conditions of Marriage, The Civil and Commercial Code Book V.

In some areas of private life, her experiences could have dwarfed those of Mr. Jonathan Head. I mean you, Mr. Jonathan Head, are a school boy in comparison. By modesty, you should ask questions on her practical life at Google Thai language. Beware, many lies sprawled there, but a few hard-found truths could easily change your standing from school boy to kindergarten kiddy.

QUESTION number 7

Mr.Jonathan Head--Q. Don’t you get tired of doing the job?

Analysis and critique of question number 7

A futile question which has to be repeated to extract an answer. Sir, performing in the Hakka Opera Comedy troupe – the present Hakka Cabinet in Thailand -- is not doing any job. It’s partying, and enjoying financial banquet.

QUESTION number 8

Mr.Jonathan Head--Q. Don’t you get tired of doing the job? Don’t you just think sometimes that this is enough. I’ve given enough, now I want to do something else?

Analysis and critique of question number 8

“…..that this is enough”. What a pretentious mis-understanding on the part of Mr. Jonathan Head. He comments on “satiété” – which means, “État d’indifférence, plus ou moin proche du dégoût, d’une personne dont on a besoin, un désir est amplement satisfait”, --Petit Robert.

Absolutely, a fatal correction must be made here. Mr. Jonathan Head’s command of Queen’s English is more dubious than mine when you, Mr. Jonathan Head, says in place of the interviewee, “I’ve given enough.” Sir, let it be made right, to “I’ve grabbed enough.”

The question of “satiété” is an outright injury to BBC’s audience worldwide. You, Mr. Jonathan Head, know the answer. Oh yeah, prove it?

Satiété? Never! You know it because I can see in your close-up intelligent eyes that you are seeing the in-Satiété glowing from orange to red in her innocent eyes.

By the way, the pair of her slant innocent eyes is beautified by esthetic surgery, a well-known fact. Unfortunately, that surgery fails in its esthetics rendition; oh yeah prove it, as proven by BBC’s digital camera close-up. C’est bien moche.

Coquetry interviewing scene: BBC’s advance press corps has tastefully created an interviewing ambiance worthy of a high end Bangkok escort service locale. It must have taken hours, even days, to prepare such a cosy intimate corner for the viewing pleasure of BBC World Service’s audience.

In a way, the place appears to be a look-alike of a dimly lit massage parlor, as shown in birds’eye view from top of camera crane, where the two dandified protagonists sitting face-to-face, knees pointing diagonally. Or, could I possibly get it all wrong, because it might have been a re-arrangement of her budoir?

Regardless, this interview can serve as a case study of failure, at journalism school worldwide. It fails to use journalistic interview to salvage someone/something from degeneracy -- in this case, a fast decaying rotten fish in putrid smell state that defies CONSISTENCY in reporting political event in Thailand by Mr. Jonathan Head.

Nevertheless, it’s a courageous endeavor on the part of the BBC and of Mr. Jonathan Head in particular, to illustrate, showing not telling, what a peculiar school of journalism means: “Il déteste la vérité par pudeur, parce qu'elle est nue.”

Sir, it’s been a good try, a sign of your impending success. Don’t be discouraged to tly again, prrrrease.

Finally, justice must be done to la grande Mademoiselle Hakka Pime Minister in Thailand. At the end of the video, la grande Mademoiselle affirms an extraordinary devotion to her Pime Ministership and democracy.

“….I not being tired. I’ll not being like upset. But I think only one thing that we have to fight for remain democracy.”

Phenomenal! Democracy prone people on the face of the earth unite! And rally in her support; a person of her quality, character, and keen sense of decency surely has nothing to lose but a jackpot to win. Nelson Mandela of South Africa is the only foreigner who was awarded the prestigious “Bharat Ratana”, top decoration from the biggest democracy in the world, India. I propose to India to award la grande Mademoiselle, as the second foreigner, with Bharat Ratana for her fighting for and her devotion to, democracy.

I propose to the Queen of England to knight la grande Mademoiselle, and to decorate her with Order of the British Empire for her undeniably unprecedented inventive version of English.

Sire, Madame, the English-as-the-second-language speaking world and I held our breath in frightful anticipation each time la grande mademoiselle pronounced the term “eLECtion”, being terrorized by her self-style free form democracy oriented dichotomy between the letter L and the letter R. Nevertheless, Dieu soit loué, she did utter it correctly all the time. As a result, what has given birth to her, where she kaim form, in politics still retains its appropriate origin: the eLECtion.

Wow, she must have been teLIbly stressful in always keeping the sacred term an L-letter word, in order that it won’t slip into the R-letter word. This, therefore, entitles her to the highest award of the Order of the BLitish Empire, c’est la raison de plus…auquel j’ajoute.

--by pricha123@yahoo.com,

Please visit my real name blog at: www.pricha123.blogspot.com

The original BBC video link at youtube http://youtu.be/hkmLxT4Alfo
บทกวี ไฮกุ หิดบี๋